On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2015-10-29 13:23, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
>>
>> However, to the non-expert eye, such as a non-developer user
>> reading the documentation, seeing "# not tested" produces the
>> impression that this piece of code is not guaranteed to work,
>> because it has never been tested.
>
>
> That impression is 100% right.
Yep! That's why I called it "not tested". In my opinion, the only
reasonable change would be
" # not tested" ----> " # broken"
That would probably create an even more accurate impression.
-- William
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
William (http://wstein.org)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
