> Yep! That's why I called it "not tested". In my opinion, the only > reasonable change would be > > " # not tested" ----> " # broken" > > That would probably create an even more accurate impression.
I flagged many doctests with 'not tested' because running them would take 10+s per function (and there are many of them). Those functions take no input whatsoever, and are just meant to return a big object (examples in graphs/strongly_regular_db). The same happens for some doctests that rely on optional LP solvers: they can take <1s with CPLEX/Gurobi, but 'standard sage' (with GLPK) cannot be expected to ever solve them. I also see calls to 'graph_editor' flagged as 'not tested' in the graph/ folder, but as I do not know this code I cannot tell the reason. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
