On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 10:12:59 AM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > Yep! That's why I called it "not tested". In my opinion, the only > > reasonable change would be > > > > " # not tested" ----> " # broken" > > > > That would probably create an even more accurate impression. > > I flagged many doctests with 'not tested' because running them would > take 10+s per function (and there are many of them). Those functions > take no input whatsoever, and are just meant to return a big object > (examples in graphs/strongly_regular_db). >
> The same happens for some doctests that rely on optional LP solvers: > they can take <1s with CPLEX/Gurobi, but 'standard sage' (with GLPK) > cannot be expected to ever solve them. > > I also see calls to 'graph_editor' flagged as 'not tested' in the > graph/ folder, but as I do not know this code I cannot tell the > reason. > There are some doctests labeled "not tested" because they produce a new git branch or some other unwanted result. -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
