A corollary to this is that relevant documentation should not exist in the TESTS block. And those edge cases should be documented. If the user wants to know more, foo?? will give them the Only True Documentation, which happens to include the TESTS block.
[x] 'foo?' should NOT display TESTS blocks. On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Travis Scrimshaw <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > >> >> [X] 'foo?' should display TESTS block. >> > > I think Thierry's argument about corner cases is a good one. Plus some > docstrings have different input formats in the TESTS block or only have > tests in the TESTS blocks (granted, this is only likely to occur in hidden > functions, but I believe it is currently in the library). > > Best, > Travis > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
