On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 1:45:00 PM UTC+1, Luca De Feo wrote: > > > if research developers 1) don't care enough about their own code to > polish it enough for going through our review process > > I don't agree with Dima that putting their code into Sage is what > researchers should do, no matter what. > I merely said that this appears to work. I never said that everything should go there. On the other hand, you mention a core Magma library that helps it beat Sage on benchmarks, I imagine such a library would be a nice fit into core Sage.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
