On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Bruno Grenet <bruno.gre...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am in favor of keeping the wiki on wiki.sagemath.org. My two-cents is that > we should either completely switch Sage's development to github (including > the developers' wiki, etc.) or stay on foo.sagemath.org for various values > of foo. It would be kind of (or super) weird to only have the wiki on > github. As long as there is no consensus to move the development to github, > the wiki should stay where it is. (Several developers, among whom some very > prolific ones, have explicitly expressed concerns against moving to github.)
+1. If anything wiki.sagemath.org should redirect to trac.sagemath.org/wiki since Trac already provides a (generally nicer, more powerful) wiki that integrates better with development ;) > As for my personal opinion, I prefer the current situation than moving to > github. First because I really like the current system of review and so on > that is on trac (so I do not see any need to move to github), second due to > the recent thread about ethical evaluation of repository services. GitHub's issue tracker is abysmal for a project this size and complexity. > Le 26/08/2016 à 23:02, William Stein a écrit : >> >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde >> <santaph...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Would you have any interest in moving the wiki >>>> to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki ? >>> >>> What would be the advantage of doing so? >> >> - We don't have to worry about hosting it ourselves. >> - It's hosted on a DDOS hardened globally distributed CDN instead of >> one single VM. >> - More standard markdown instead of a the moin moin wiki custom format. >> - Revision history stored in git; you can easily clone the whole wiki, >> work on it offline, and push it. >> - Better antispammer measure and account management handled by Github. >> >>> What do the Sage developers even want to use the wiki for? Apart from >>> SageDays organisation. >> >> - listing sage days >> - there's a nice list of interact examples: >> https://wiki.sagemath.org/interact >> >> Look at https://wiki.sagemath.org/RecentChanges to see what people >> *do* use the wiki for. E.g., there's been a lot of activity on a page >> "Coding Theory in Sage: A collection of ideas and long-term goals for >> Coding Theory in Sage, and the people interested." today by several >> people. >> >> There's even a recently modified page here >> https://wiki.sagemath.org/Debate/Collective%20infrastructure%20management >> that has a bunch of arguments *against* moving hosting of sage-related >> services from universities to third party cloud hosting services >> (Github, Google, etc.). >> >>> At SageDays75, we just created (or rewrote) >>> https://wiki.sagemath.org/Coding_Theory sub-page and propose it to be a >>> place to discuss long-term goals for coding theory in Sage. Let's see >>> how it works out. >> >> That's definitely a very good use of this wiki (or any other sage one). >> >> -- William >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
