On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
> As far as I know, the only real use-case for milestone is a milestone like
> `sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix` or `sage-pending`. I think that every

Well I'm not sure how you're defining "real use-case".

sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix is a terrible "milestone" and I
wouldn't mind getting rid of that too.  That's a resolution status for
an issue, not project goal.

> milestone of the form `sage-X.Y` is essentially treated equivalently.
> So, we might as well git rid of the `sage-X.Y` milestones completely. But
> the release manager can correct me if I'm wrong.

Or use them in a useful way to actually associate issues with releases
in which we intend to address them.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to