On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 4:41:32 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> >> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would >> better be merged into Sage. > > > It seems a nice way to share code that enhances Sage in special areas, with > least "friction". Users (and developers) don't want to have a behemoth Sage > with all the code merged. >
There is also a massive amount of code people write themselves, which could be generally useful, which they never really share at all because we don't have an organized endorsed way of doing so. I hear from tons of people about this often at the Sage booth at the Joint Math meetings... William > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
