I asked in the Singular forum, how to change the exponent size for Singular:

https://www.singular.uni-kl.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=2576

Is it transparent for overflow detection?
>

I don't understand the question.

My question is, does overflow detection work correcly with different 
exponent sizes than 16 bit?


Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017 21:40:03 UTC+1 schrieb Bill Hart:
>
> I can only answer one of your questions.
>
> On Saturday, 11 February 2017 17:16:29 UTC+1, Jakob Kroeker wrote:
>>
>> By default, Singular uses 16 bit exponents. But it is perfectly capable 
>>> of working with exponents up to 64 bits. That will be slower of course.
>>>
>>
>> How to change this? Is it runtime or compile-time?
>>
>
> I believe it can be set at runtime. Hans surely knows how to change it.
>  
>
>> Is it transparent for overflow detection?
>>
>
> I don't understand the question.
>  
>
>>
>> I guess it isn't easy for Sage to change the relevant ring upon overflow 
>>> to one using 64 bit exponents.
>>>
>>
>> I have no idea;
>>
>> Jakob
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to