Dear Jeroen, On 2018-04-05, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > On 2018-04-05 17:53, Simon King wrote: >> for the problem at #18514 it >> would be fine to have `sage -b` *before* building p_group_cohomology. > > I'm not entirely sure which "problem at #18514" you are talking about, > but that won't fix the "ImportError: No module named meataxe" problem.
Yes, that is what I was talking about. > Imagine that sagelib is built before p_group_cohomology. Then packages > could be built in the following order: > > sagelib > meataxe > p_group_cohomology > > This way, sagelib would not build the meataxe interface. But couldn't the same happen when putting $(SAGERUNTIME) into the list of dependencies? Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
