On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 1:47:48 AM UTC-4, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Tue 2019-10-29 11:57 UTC, kcrisman: > > > >> Perhaps should we simply remove the pseudo-packages whose type is "pip" > >> (since there is the "sage -pip install" command), that is: > >> > >> beautifulsoup > >> biopython > >> brian > >> guppy > >> mercurial > >> mpi4py > >> nibabel > >> pybtex > >> pyflakes > >> sqlalchemy > >> trac > > > > > > As long as we can test that this works properly with "our" Python > > and make sure to update any documentation, that would be okay. > > brian for instance probably doesn't need too much doc change. > > > beautifulsoup was (is?) used for sagenb -> rst conversion, > > if I recall correctly, and if it isn't used elsewhere would probably be > > reasonable to deprecate, much as one might mourn the loss of > > sagenb in the near future. (Though there may still be some places > > in some tutorials where this is mentioned, beautifulsoup I mean.) > > We should keep the ability to export sagenb ".sws" worksheets > to rst and to ipynb for a long time. There are many, really many > people still using SageNB, and many, really many sws worksheets > out there. >
That is very good news (to me, though probably not to most) but then we may need to keep the older beautifulsoup package unless someone can test robustly whether the new one has similar enough of an API to work with this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/161d6918-5dd0-44de-996c-95eb0111c709%40googlegroups.com.
