On Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 10:31:39 AM UTC-4, David Joyner wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 9:23 AM Meem <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> (Not sure if this is the correct forum for this question). >> >> When I don't have access to paper and/or a large work surface (for >> example on a coach seat in an airplane): I try to compose my proofs using >> LaTeX. >> >> So I copy the previous line -- cross out terms -- perform additional >> manipulations and continue till I hit a wall or finish the proof. >> >> I'm half decent at LaTeX, but the syntax is so verbose that it becomes >> tiring. >> >> I am thinking of using a more compact representation with some possible >> algebraic support from the underlying system. >> >> I've been (briefly) checking out Sage and am delighted that I can convert >> stuff to LaTeX. >> >> So I guess my question has the following parts: >> >> 1. Is Sage suitable for writing proofs? >> >> 2. Does it have any facilities to keep the arguments/steps in a proof >> format -- kind of like in LaTeX there is a proof typesetting option? >> >> >> Another open-source option you may find more congenial to your needs is Lurch - http://lurchmath.org
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
