You might be interested in LyX as well. It's designed for typesetting, but simplifies a lot of math expressions in LaTeX.
https://www.lyx.org/ On Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 6:23:22 AM UTC-7, Meem wrote: > > Hi, > > (Not sure if this is the correct forum for this question). > > When I don't have access to paper and/or a large work surface (for example > on a coach seat in an airplane): I try to compose my proofs using LaTeX. > > So I copy the previous line -- cross out terms -- perform additional > manipulations and continue till I hit a wall or finish the proof. > > I'm half decent at LaTeX, but the syntax is so verbose that it becomes > tiring. > > I am thinking of using a more compact representation with some possible > algebraic support from the underlying system. > > I've been (briefly) checking out Sage and am delighted that I can convert > stuff to LaTeX. > > So I guess my question has the following parts: > > 1. Is Sage suitable for writing proofs? > > 2. Does it have any facilities to keep the arguments/steps in a proof > format -- kind of like in LaTeX there is a proof typesetting option? > > 3. What tutorials should I look at for this type of work -- the stuff I > wish to tackle first is mostly simple proofs from say an introductory > course in analysis -- mostly delta/epsilon stuff. > > Thanks! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-edu/061ceef3-d1d5-48ca-a2a2-7d10dc8d17db%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
