On 06/01/16 12:45, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:30 PM, François Bissey <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Well Andrew Ohana is the maintainer of "brial" but he doesn't have the time to take care of it apparently. I am not the maintainer, as per this <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21searchin/sage-devel/polybori/sage-devel/9Uhnvm3wef8/kkGxWZ9QR0gJ> discussion or the ticket(s) attached to it, I expressly was not interested in being the maintainer (nor do I have any time now or in the foreseeable future to maintain it). However, despite that discussion no one stepped, and given that I think that it would be best to pursue the other path proposed in that discussion which was the removal of brial/polybori as a standard package (likely making it experimental given that it is unmaintained).
Yes, sorry for the implication. I shouldn't have made it. The reality is polybori/brial is connected very deeply in sage and just removing it will be a lot of work. If we want to remove it, we need a plan to scrub sage, it has to be organised. In the mean time we'll need someone to bump things when needed, a bit like sagenb. Andrew made it clear he wasn't that person. Francois -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
