Is your pip issue fixed by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21812?
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 2:15:29 AM UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > After manually upgrading pip, I still get a raft of failed test. It seems > (see uploaded log) that those are due to pip advertising a deprecation of > teh format used for the database. > > One errot (on simplicial_complex.py) is genuine ; this test appasses with > no errors when run standalone (a long standing problem with this test. > > I conclude that : > - the patches pointed by Dima do solve the problem of compiling flint > and arb on Debian testing > - another problem is introduced by pip advertising. > > Questions : > - Should I package the patches that solve Trac#21782 > <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21782> > - Should I create a new ticket about pip's newfound verbosity ? > > HTH, > > -- > Emmanuel Charpentier > > Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 09:40:15 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : >> >> A second attempt at rebuilding after distcleant gives the same results : >> a raft of errors mostly bound to pip's advertising. However, I an not sure >> of what I read in the results of tolerance.py... >> >> I'll re-upgrade pip and post the results. >> >> HTH, >> >> -- >> Emmanuel Charpentier >> >> >> Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 03:20:26 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : >>> >>> Sorry for being late : I had a severe NMI from the Real World (TM). >>> >>> Using the patches pointed by Dima succeed in compiling Sage. However, I >>> dat a raft of failutes which mostly relate to pip being outdated. >>> >>> Updating pip "by hand" (./sage -pip install --upgrade pip) was a bad >>> mistake : different errors at the same point, >>> >>> I'll (make distclean && make ptestlong ) again overnight and post the >>> hopefully clean) log tomorrow. >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> PS : about penalties for abusing compilers : did you consider this >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impalement> ? >>> >>> -- >>> Emmanuel Charpentier >>> >>> Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 01:04:36 UTC+1, François a écrit : >>>> >>>> Apologies if you missed my later post. I had read the patch in reverse. >>>> You do the correct thing and they cripple it. In a curious way too. >>>> >>>> I suspect they do PIE (position independent executable - a relative of >>>> PIC) >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> +1 about having severe penalties for crippling compilers. >>>> >>>> François >>>> >>>> > On 6/11/2016, at 12:19, 'Bill Hart' via sage-release < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On 5 November 2016 at 20:11, Francois Bissey < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > That was clearly a mistake in flint/arb in the first place. “-r” is a >>>> flag >>>> > for the linker, not sure what gcc was doing with it in the first >>>> place. >>>> > >>>> > -Wl is supposed to pass the option to the linker. >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
