I dunno yet, just testing in a branch with 21812 and the Debian fix for 
flint François doesn't like. It'll have to wait a bit (ReaLife NMI...).

Posting results in 2-4 hours. Stay tuned.

--
Emmanuel Charpentier


Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 17:04:37 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>
> Is your pip issue fixed by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21812?
>
>
> On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 2:15:29 AM UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier 
> wrote:
>>
>> After manually upgrading pip, I still get a raft of failed test. It seems 
>> (see uploaded log) that those are due to pip advertising a deprecation of 
>> teh format used for the database.
>>
>> One errot (on simplicial_complex.py) is genuine ; this test appasses with 
>> no errors when run standalone (a long standing problem with this test.
>>
>> I conclude that :
>>     - the patches pointed by Dima do solve the problem of compiling flint 
>> and arb on Debian testing
>>     - another problem is introduced by pip advertising.
>>
>> Questions :
>>     - Should I package the patches that solve Trac#21782 
>> <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21782>
>>     - Should I create a new ticket about  pip's newfound verbosity ?
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> --
>> Emmanuel Charpentier
>>
>> Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 09:40:15 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>>>
>>> A second attempt at rebuilding after distcleant gives the same results : 
>>> a raft of errors mostly bound to pip's advertising. However, I an not sure 
>>> of what I read in the results of tolerance.py...
>>>
>>> I'll re-upgrade pip and post the results.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Emmanuel Charpentier
>>>
>>>
>>> Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 03:20:26 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a 
>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for being late : I had a severe NMI from the Real World (TM).
>>>>
>>>> Using the patches pointed by Dima succeed in compiling Sage. However, I 
>>>> dat a raft of failutes which mostly relate to pip being outdated.
>>>>
>>>> Updating pip "by hand" (./sage -pip install --upgrade pip) was a bad 
>>>> mistake : different errors at the same point,
>>>>
>>>> I'll (make distclean && make ptestlong ) again  overnight and post the 
>>>> hopefully clean) log tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>>
>>>> PS : about penalties for abusing compilers : did you consider this 
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impalement> ?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Emmanuel Charpentier
>>>>
>>>> Le dimanche 6 novembre 2016 01:04:36 UTC+1, François a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> Apologies if you missed my later post. I had read the patch in 
>>>>> reverse. 
>>>>> You do the correct thing and they cripple it. In a curious way too. 
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect they do PIE (position independent executable - a relative of 
>>>>> PIC) 
>>>>> wrong. 
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 about having severe penalties for crippling compilers. 
>>>>>
>>>>> François 
>>>>>
>>>>> > On 6/11/2016, at 12:19, 'Bill Hart' via sage-release <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > On 5 November 2016 at 20:11, Francois Bissey <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: 
>>>>> > That was clearly a mistake in flint/arb in the first place. “-r” is 
>>>>> a flag 
>>>>> > for the linker, not sure what gcc was doing with it in the first 
>>>>> place. 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > -Wl is supposed to pass the option to the linker.   
>>>>> > 
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to