Similar results on  smaller machine (Debian testing, core i5, 8 GB RAM, no 
gap_packages). Transient failures:

File                                          | Result           
----------------------------------------------+------------------
src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py            | 1 doctest failed 
src/sage/plot/animate.py                      | 7 doctests failed
src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/misc/latex.py                        | 1 doctest failed 
src/sage/misc/persist.pyx                     | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/coding/databases.py                  | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/repl/load.py                         | 1 doctest failed 
src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py                | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/misc/remote_file.py                  | 2 doctests failed
src/sage/databases/findstat.py                | 9 doctests failed
src/sage/interfaces/magma_free.py             | 2 doctests failed

HTH,

Le lundi 11 novembre 2019 09:49:02 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
> FWIW, upgrading a Python 3-based 9.0.beta4 to 9.0.beta5 on Debian testing 
> running on core i7 + 16 GB Ram gives me ptestalllong results quite close 
> to those already reported for previous betas:
>
>    - No failure for ptestlong-related doctests
>    - One permanent failure on src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
>    - Eleven transient failures:
>
>
> File                                          | Result           
> ----------------------------------------------+------------------
> src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py     | 6 doctests failed
> src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py            | 1 doctest failed 
> src/sage/plot/animate.py                      | 7 doctests failed
> src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/misc/latex.py                        | 1 doctest failed 
> src/sage/coding/databases.py                  | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/misc/persist.pyx                     | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/repl/load.py                         | 1 doctest failed 
> src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py                | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/misc/remote_file.py                  | 2 doctests failed
> src/sage/databases/findstat.py                | 9 doctests failed
>
> HTH,
>
> Le lundi 11 novembre 2019 00:59:52 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :
>>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>>
>>
>> 93db4cc438 (tag: 9.0.beta5, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 9.0.beta5
>> 9d8ca86b1e Trac #28657: Build Sage without "python"
>> 6e157378e7 Trac #28702: Three.js: Add option to render only single side 
>> of surface
>> dd2f597b29 Trac #28699: Three.js: Upgrade to r110
>> 6512528983 Trac #28669: Unnecessary coordinate check while initializing 
>> an integrated curve
>> 5bf0c36e04 Trac #27195: slightly faster highest_weight_vectors_iterator
>> 8cf66c860a Trac #28691: Xcode 11 breaks gfortran build
>> 9296d51ea4 Trac #28690: Vector Bundles: Section Module Name Fix
>> 64cf3b03da Trac #28687: Demote scons to experimental
>> 3e5c24e5dd Trac #28245: Implement center of a HyperplaneArrangement
>> f362bea55f Trac #28693: Update sagenb exporter 3.3
>> c26dd23b46 Trac #28681: py3: Construction of (A#A)+(A#A) fails for 
>> CombinatorialFreeModules
>> 43a77880b6 Trac #28678: Bug in CombinatorialPolyhedron of empty Lattice 
>> polytope
>> 20da4fadea Trac #28674: RecursivelyEnumeratedSet: certified enumeration 
>> order
>> b5e6a225eb Trac #28645: Error in precision of Tate elliptic curves over Qp
>> 3c16c6a771 Trac #28578: Mixed Forms Code Improvements
>> 75294da5d9 Trac #28574: conversion of nested polynomial rings to Macaulay2
>> 3145f5344c Trac #28506: Direct sum of polyhedron is broken, so is 
>> minkowski difference and face truncation
>> 0976a5cf93 Trac #28502: MR36: Use Sphinx hash function
>> b90b558fc9 (tag: 9.0.beta4) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.beta4
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/77407917-b6fc-4d7b-9172-d89d6d9756ee%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to