Thanks for the clarification. I was only referring to the 2nd of the two solutions that you brought up in your previous message. "I'm actively looking at ways to improve this, and the solution will be either social (certain authors/reviewers will automatically be at the end of the queue) or automatic ticket rejections (which have a pretty high chance of false negatives, in particular since incremental builds are currently flakey)."
On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 3:19:21 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 2:04:02 AM UTC+1 [email protected] > wrote: > >> I'd say replacing this with a mild-mannered script that does the said >> "automatic ticket rejections" would be an improvement for the project. > > > I'm sorry, but which part of "not running a private CI service for the > Sage project" is unclear to you? > > We definitely should have better CI, but I can't provide that in addition > to the integration work that happens after tickets pass their tests (i.e. > after they should have been set to positive review). > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/7a99582f-ecd8-470a-99ef-559e61f8ead8n%40googlegroups.com.
