On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Justin C. Walker <jus...@mac.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:07 , gerhard wrote: > >> Print methods for matrices with subdivisions >> >> let M be a matrix over QQ: >> subdivisions are printed fine >> over GF(2): >> M.get_subdivisions() shows the subdivisions are defined, >> but the print method does not know about them. > > Yup. Most matrix classes seem to use a common method for printing, > while the 'mod 2' matrix implementation has its own "stringify" method. > > There may be a good explanation for this, but commenting out the mod2 > method seems to have the right effect without damaging anything else. > At least with minimal testing. > >> The show methods cannot handle subdivisions altogether. > > I'm not sure I understand. For other than the mod 2 elements, show(X) > produces an image of a subdivided matrix. Do you mean just in the mod > 2 case? > >> Are there any plans to enhance these printing methods? > > I think it qualifies as a bug, and I've created a Trac report for the > problem: > <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5714> > > Thanks for reporting this.
I made another related ticket, since subdivision lifting is broken: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5716 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
