On 8 říj, 19:41, Ranjit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> does not. So I guess there's an upper limit to the number of
> operations that the expression being replaced can have to work in subs
> ().
Perhaps true, but IMHO very risky guess which is not true, if pattern
matching in Maxima is behind the scene when doing substitution.
Robert Marik
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
