William Stein <[email protected]> writes:

> The above definition of binomial is documented if you type "binomial?"
> in Sage.  This is also arguable the standard usage of "binomial",
> since it is the same in Mathematica, Maple, Maxima, Pari, GAP, and
> Magma:
>
> sage: mathematica('Binomial[-7,1]')
> -7
> sage: maple('binomial(-7,1)')
> -7
> sage: pari('binomial(-7,1)')
> -7
> sage: maxima('binomial(-7,1)')
> -7
> sage: gap('Binomial(-7,1)')
> -7
> sage: magma('Binomial(-7,1)')
> -7
>
>> Axiom returns 0 in this case.
>
> Based on the above, maybe Axiom should be changed?

FriCAS give 0 for the input above, *but* this is only half of the story.
In FriCAS (and Axiom, and I believe Sage too), the answer of a
computation depends on the domain of the input.  Eg.:

(1) -> 0::INT^0::NNI

   (1)  1
                                         Type: PositiveInteger
(2) -> 0.0^0.0
 
   >> Error detected within library code:
   0^0 is undefined

I think that at least here, this makes sense: when computing with
integers, I want that 0^0 = 1, when computing with floats, I don't.


However, even with this simple example, the right thing to do is not
always clear.  Eg.:

(3) -> 0^(0::FRAC INT)

 Function Selection for ^
      Arguments: (NNI,FRAC(INT)) 
      Default target type: AlgebraicNumber 
 
 [1]  signature:   (AN,FRAC(INT)) -> AN
      implemented: slot $$(Fraction (Integer)) from AN
 

   (3)  1
                                     Type: AlgebraicNumber

(AN is short for AlgebraicNumber) 

Shouldn't this give an error?  (I'm inclined to say yes, but I'm not
entirely sure...) There was some discussion in

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2004-06/

but unfortunately, it was never quite "finished".

Concerning binomial coefficients, the same applies. I must say that I'm
rather tending to think that the two operations should give the same
result.  Bug fixes and/or unittests are welcome.  In fact, for 0^0, a
series of tests saying for which domains we want an error and for which
1 might be a good excercise.

Concerning FriCAS, other things are simply more pressing.  Developers
welcome.

Martin

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to