Martin Rubey <[email protected]> writes:
>> Are you writing at length about 0^0 only by analogy to give an example
>> of a function F(x) such that the value of F depends on the parent (or
>> type) of x such that applying F does not commute with some natural
>> inclusion of sets?
>
> Exactly. Sorry for being lengthier than necessary, I guess I was
> pointing out something banal.
Oh dear, I just realised I missed the main point:
(1) -> binomial(-7,1)$EXPR INT
(1) - 7
Type: Expression(Integer)
(2) -> binomial(-7,1)
(2) 0
Type: NonNegativeInteger
Sorry,
Martin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
