On May 19, 11:36 am, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/19/2010 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 19, 2010, Jason Grout<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 05/19/2010 09:58 AM, Tobias Katz wrote: > >> Is the best way to convolve numerically? > > >> You might look at scipy or numpy (both of which are included in Sage). > >> They have functions which do convolutions. > > > I think the OP asked for *symbolic* convolution. I don't think > > scipy/jumpy do anything symbolically. > > I agree. I was responding to his last question about convolving things > numerically. >
Symbolic is implemented in Mma (see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Convolution.html) but Maple seems to only have it for audio applications (? based on brief search on maplesoft.com). Should we open a ticket for this? - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
