On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, kcrisman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On May 19, 11:36 am, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 05/19/2010 10:22 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday, May 19, 2010, Jason Grout<[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> On 05/19/2010 09:58 AM, Tobias Katz wrote: >> >> Is the best way to convolve numerically? >> >> >> You might look at scipy or numpy (both of which are included in Sage). >> >> They have functions which do convolutions. >> >> > I think the OP asked for *symbolic* convolution. I don't think >> > scipy/jumpy do anything symbolically. >> >> I agree. I was responding to his last question about convolving things >> numerically. >> > > Symbolic is implemented in Mma (see > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Convolution.html) > but Maple seems to only have it for audio applications (? based on > brief search on maplesoft.com). Should we open a ticket for this?
Yes, based on the mission statement of Sage: "... viable alternative to ... Mathematica" -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
