Hi Jason!

On 8 Sep., 20:57, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually, for a while now, "for i in range(...)" is translated into fast
> C intelligently.  In fact, I believe it's the recommended syntax now,
> instead of 0<=i<...

Even if you do *not* cdefine "cdef int i"? That's new to me.

Cheers,
Simon

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to