Thanks for the reply! On Saturday, April 4, 2020 at 1:00:12 PM UTC-4, rana-aere wrote: > > I modified the code and tried to trace computation. > > I think you stepped over the weakness of Sagemath. >
I was afraid that that would be the case... > > The modified code is quoted below. > The line with many minus signs is meant to separate the program in > different cells of jupyter notebook. > My impression is that the program computes R, P + Q, LHS = (P + Q) + R and > then Q + R for RHS. > After that the data for the outer call of P + (Q + R) becomes too big so > that Sagemath cannot pass the parameters to add_EC. > Thanks for taking the time to do that! I really appreciate. I wonder if this is an issue that I should report or if it simply "how it is"... I think we will just stick with Magma for now. I try to use (and teach with) Sage whenever possible, but in this case I think I will have to stick with Magma. Thanks again! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/2bd8bc8a-8b42-47a6-8c13-f677edebff69%40googlegroups.com.
