Dear Vincent , I am tempted to do so. But, for now, I must focus on trouble of Sagemath start-up in MacOS.
I have fixed a trick of Sagemath (double click) hands over the ticket to the browser. At the same time, I fixed some part of the trouble of error messages truncated. I have an idea on some other problem with getcwd. I have an idea on fixing problematic validation on MacOS HighSierra--Mojave--Catalina. ---- This turned out much more difficult than I expected. I must also fix deprecation warnings, which makes us hard to consult new users installing Sagemath. ---- Most of this turns out upstream problem so I must find a way to reproduce warnings. I accept to work on the ring but please allow me to be very slow. In any event I take your welcome message. Thank you. 2020年4月7日火曜日 2時09分21秒 UTC+9 vdelecroix: > > Dear rana-aere, > > If you think this is an issue, then *you* should be working on it. > Every SageMath developers is a volunteer that does not take orders > and think by herself or himself what is relevant to do. Note that > helping others is indeed a concern for most of them. > > As a start: > > - you can check whether there is already an existing ticket > on https://trac.sagemath.org/ for this problem, and if not > open one which tracks down the problem to its essence (for > example it has nothing to do with elliptic curves). > > - If you have a *concrete suggestion* in favor of an improvement > but does not know how to implement it, this could be discussed > on the sage-devel mailing list. > > SageMath developers are mature enough to read the messages on this > list and figure out what is relevant to do without your call. > > Best > Vincent > > Le 05/04/2020 à 17:38, rana-aere a écrit : > > I think it is an issue to be reported. > > So, I wait for someone to respond this question. > > > > To developers of the SageMath module of rings: > > Please verify the program in this question, with debugging messages I > added. > > we ran into a weakness of SageMath either > > in formula processing producing too complicated denominators > > or in SageMath module of quotient of rings, which fail to reduce the > > element of the ring. > > I believe the code reported here is an important entry for new students > to > > SageMath. > > Please program what is going for this program. > > > > 2020年4月5日日曜日 5時56分25秒 UTC+9 finotti: > >> > >> Thanks for the reply! > >> > >> On Saturday, April 4, 2020 at 1:00:12 PM UTC-4, rana-aere wrote: > >>> > >>> I modified the code and tried to trace computation. > >>> > >>> I think you stepped over the weakness of Sagemath. > >>> > >> > >> I was afraid that that would be the case... > >> > >> > >>> > >>> The modified code is quoted below. > >>> The line with many minus signs is meant to separate the program in > >>> different cells of jupyter notebook. > >>> My impression is that the program computes R, P + Q, LHS = (P + Q) + R > >>> and then Q + R for RHS. > >>> After that the data for the outer call of P + (Q + R) becomes too big > so > >>> that Sagemath cannot pass the parameters to add_EC. > >>> > >> > >> Thanks for taking the time to do that! I really appreciate. I wonder > if > >> this is an issue that I should report or if it simply "how it is"... > >> > >> I think we will just stick with Magma for now. I try to use (and teach > >> with) Sage whenever possible, but in this case I think I will have to > stick > >> with Magma. > >> > >> Thanks again! > >> > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/14512428-56d0-4176-9b34-981b422691ed%40googlegroups.com.
