#4111: [with patch, positive review] move basic types to new coercion model
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  robertwb  |        Owner:  robertwb  
     Type:  defect    |       Status:  new       
 Priority:  major     |    Milestone:  sage-3.1.3
Component:  coercion  |   Resolution:            
 Keywords:            |  
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by mabshoff):

 Robert,

 I merged the four patches and the only issue is the following:
 {{{
 sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfr.pyx
 **********************************************************************
 File "/scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/tmp/real_mpfr.py",
 line 1900:
     sage: RR(-1.234567)._pari_()
 Expected:
     -1.2345670000000000000
 Got:
     -1.2345670000000000001
 **********************************************************************
 1 items had failures:
    1 of  11 in __main__.example_58
 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
 For whitespace errors, see the file /scratch/mabshoff/release-
 cycle/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/tmp/.doctest_real_mpfr.py
          [10.8 s]
 }}}
 I don't changing the doctest is the solution here since the "Real Number
 Inputs Improved" patch from 3.1.2 was supposed to fix this. Or am I
 completely wrong here? Either way: feel free to add a patch here or in
 case it is something more than non-trivial open another ticket.

 Cheers,

 Michael

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4111#comment:9>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to