sage-trac  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [sage-trac] #19618: Update Valgrind to 3.11.0 sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19140: Implement general energy function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19140: Implement general energy function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19140: Implement general energy function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19140: Implement general energy function sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19139: Implement categories for KR crystals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19139: Implement categories for KR crystals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19139: Implement categories for KR crystals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19139: Implement categories for KR crystals sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19139: Implement categories for KR crystals sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20695: Make an optional package for flatsurf and remove associated Sage source code sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20695: Make an optional package for flatsurf and remove associated Sage source code sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20695: Make an optional package for flatsurf and remove associated Sage source code sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21089: Tamari Interval-posets and random doctest failure sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21089: Tamari Interval-posets and random doctest failure sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21089: Tamari Interval-posets and random doctest failure sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21088: Base Class for Skew Polynomials over Finite Fields sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21095: Slowness in exactification sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative "from MODULE cimport SYMBOL" in .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative "from MODULE cimport SYMBOL" in .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in Cython .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in Cython .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in Cython .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21090: Fix implicit relative cimports in Cython .pxd/.pxi files sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20712: Log discovered paths in setup.py sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20712: Log discovered paths in setup.py sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20712: Log discovered paths in setup.py sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21093: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic() sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21093: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic() sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21093: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic() sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21093: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic() sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21087: new style package for sip sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21091: error in is_polynomial for projective morphism sage-trac
  • [sage-trac] #21091: error in is_polynomial for projective morphism sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21091: error in is_polynomial for projective morphism sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21091: error in is_polynomial for projective morphism sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21091: error in is_polynomial for projective morphism sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21094: Sage package for SCIP integer programming solver sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21092: Unhandled case in EllipticCurve_from_cubic sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21086: new style package for database_kohel sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19430: Update Jmol release to use new security certificate sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20870: nauty upstream source tarball has setgid on top-level directory sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20870: nauty upstream source tarball has setgid on top-level directory sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20870: nauty upstream source tarball has setgid on top-level directory sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20870: nauty upstream source tarball has setgid on top-level directory sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20870: nauty upstream source tarball has setgid on top-level directory sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21085: Blow ups for affine/projective curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21085: Blow ups for affine/projective curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21085: Blow ups for affine/projective curves sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21084: Elements of cartesian product should have a `__len__`. sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21083: Upgrade BRiAl and build it without '-std=c++98' when upstream issue #11 is fixed sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21083: Upgrade BRiAl and build it without '-std=c++98' when upstream issue #11 is fixed sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20929: linbox does not compile gcc6 / c++11 sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20717: elliptic_curves upstream tarball contains OSX extended attribute files sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21082: Proper solution for warnings about experimental packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21082: Proper solution for warnings about experimental packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21082: Proper solution for warnings about experimental packages sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21081: Cup product for cochains sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21081: Cup product for cochains sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21081: Cup product for cochains sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21081: Cup product for cochains sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21081: Cup product for cochains sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21081: Cup product for cochains sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21081: Cup product for cochains sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19220: Archive superseded/broken old-style packages sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #9461: Doctest failures with --randorder X sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #9461: Doctest failures with --randorder X sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #9461: Doctest failures with --randorder X sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #9461: Doctest failures with sage -t -randorder=X sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21080: Cartesian product of posets fails random doctest sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21080: Cartesian product of posets fails random doctest sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21080: Cartesian product of posets fails random doctest sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21080: Cartesian product of posets fails random doctest sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #21079: Update URLs to documentation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21079: Update URLs to documentation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21079: Update URLs to documentation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21079: Update URLs to documentation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21079: Update URLs to documentation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21079: Update URLs to documentation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21079: Update URLs to documentation sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest in TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21078: failing doctest with TamariIntervalPosets_size sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21077: failing doctest with optional package coxeter 3 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21077: failing doctests with optional package coxeter 3 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21077: failing doctests with optional package coxeter 3 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21077: failing doctests with optional package coxeter 3 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21077: failing doctests with optional package coxeter 3 sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20431: minor documentation format issue sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20431: minor documentation format issue sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20431: minor documentation format issue sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20431: minor documentation format issue sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20472: Remove old-style PyX package sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20472: Remove old-style PyX package sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21076: make pyx a new style pip package sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21076: make pyx a new style pip package sage-trac

• Earlier messages
• Later messages