#4249: [with new patch, with positive review] Inconsistency in number field
integral bases
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: cremona | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.2.1
Component: number theory | Resolution:
Keywords: number fields |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by cremona):
Replying to [comment:25 craigcitro]:
> I think John C wrote sage-4249.patch, I wrote trac-4249-1a.patch as part
of the review, John Voight and I each wrote half of trac-4249-pt2a.patch
and reviewed the other, and John Cremona also reviewed this patch. Then
John Cremona wrote pt3 and the doc patch.
>
That is accurate as far as I am concerned.
> Either that, or it was Col. Mustard in the study, with the candlestick.
(I would be completely in favor of that actually appearing in the release
notes.)
>
> I'm not sure if the original patch was written with Aranes Maite.
No, but she (my student) was the one who alerted me to the problem in the
first place.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4249#comment:26>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
