#4282: [with patch, needs work] symbolic minpoly
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.2.2
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment (by robertwb):
On point (3), should I simply consolidate minpoly_numeric into minpoly, or
is it better to keep these two functions separate?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4282#comment:6>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---