#4973: [with patch, positive review] rewrite the function __getitem__ in
matrix0.pyx to support slices better, negative indices, and be faster
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  mabshoff  |        Owner:  jason   
     Type:  defect    |       Status:  assigned
 Priority:  major     |    Milestone:  sage-3.3
Component:  misc      |   Resolution:          
 Keywords:            |  
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by craigcitro):

 Ah, excellent. In this particular case, we've just done both of those
 checks -- the typecheck and the length check -- so I'm going to say we
 should stick with the `PyTuple_GET_ITEM` (we also raise an explicit
 exception if the length is wrong), but I'm happy to know that in general,
 Cython generates such good code.

 It'd be nice if Cython skipped the typecheck when it knew the type --
 should a ticket be filed on the Cython trac server?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4973#comment:21>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to