sage-trac  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [sage-trac] #21002: LatticePoset: certificates for non-[semi]modularity and non-distributivity sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19171: Add a method `divides` to Polynomial sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21001: py imports in logic, sat, monoids, gsl folders (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21001: py3 imports in logic, sat, monoids, gsl folders (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21001: py3 imports in logic, sat, monoids, gsl folders (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21001: py3 imports in logic, sat, monoids, gsl folders (futurize) sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #12364: ValueError + AttributeError when calling layout_graphviz on a Hasse diagram sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #12364: ValueError + AttributeError when calling layout_graphviz on a Hasse diagram sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #12364: ValueError + AttributeError when calling layout_graphviz on a Hasse diagram sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #12364: ValueError + AttributeError when calling layout_graphviz on a Hasse diagram sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #12364: ValueError + AttributeError when calling layout_graphviz on a Hasse diagram sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #21000: wrong result for pari minpoly sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #20999: QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20999: ZZ(libgap(-1)) and QQ(libgap(-1)) fails sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20769: LatticePoset: Orthocomplements, part 1 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20769: LatticePoset: Orthocomplements, part 1 sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20727: LatticePoset: about complements sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20727: LatticePoset: about complements sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20897: Fixes to SAGE_BANNER=bare support throughout sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #17886: Faster qqbar operations using resultants sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #18333: Cleanup and speedup in QQbar sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #18333: Cleanup and speedup in QQbar sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #14977: Classes for Hilbert modular groups sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #16102: Including code to compute Lyapunov exponents for translation surfaces. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #16102: Including code to compute Lyapunov exponents for translation surfaces. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #16102: Including code to compute Lyapunov exponents for translation surfaces. sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #20998: convert a few cmp to richcmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert a few cmp to richcmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert a few cmp to richcmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert a few cmp to richcmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert a few cmp to richcmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert a few cmp to richcmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: convert _cmp_ to __richcmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: removing deprecated builtin cmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: removing deprecated builtin cmp in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: Removing deprecated cmp and __cmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: Removing deprecated cmp and __cmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20998: Removing deprecated cmp and __cmp__ in some pyx files sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15634: basic implementation of operads sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #14244: Add Jacobi theta series to Sage sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #14244: Add Jacobi theta series to Sage sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #6371: Implement Riemann theta functions sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #13093: implement numerical computation of periods of modular forms sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20997: Toy implementation of Matrix-F5 algorithm and various adaptation sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #8622: Atkin-Lehner operators don't work for odd weight modular forms sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #6925: Fast way of calculating cuspidal subgroup of J0(N) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #6925: Fast way of calculating cuspidal subgroup of J0(N) sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19387: Facade Options For Poset Examples sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19387: Facade Options For Poset Examples sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19387: Facade Options For Poset Examples sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20864: Change caching of modular symbols of elliptic curves sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #16820: Implement ABCs for Lie algebras and finite dimensional given by structure coefficients sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #16820: Implement ABCs for Lie algebras and finite dimensional given by structure coefficients sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #16820: Implement ABCs for Lie algebras and finite dimensional given by structure coefficients sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #16820: Implement ABCs for Lie algebras and finite dimensional given by structure coefficients sage-trac
• [sage-trac] [Sage] New user registration: dbs sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20932: Issues with p1list in modular symbols sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20932: Issues with p1list in modular symbols sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20932: Issues with p1list in modular symbols sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20932: Issues with p1list in modular symbols sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20932: Issues with p1list in modular symbols sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #20996: a few typoes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20996: a few typoes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20996: a few typoes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20996: a few typoes sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20996: a few typos sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20996: a few typos sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #20995: py imports in modules folder (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20995: py imports in modules folder (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20995: py imports in modules folder (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20995: py imports in modules folder (futurize) sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #12254: __cmp__ for torsion subgroups of elliptic curves is too weak. sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #12254: __cmp__ for torsion subgroups of elliptic curves is too weak. sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15530: Metaticket: Add support for python 3.3+ sage-trac
• [sage-trac] #20994: py imports in misc folder (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20994: py imports in misc folder (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20994: py imports in misc folder (futurize) sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20994: py imports in misc folder (futurize) sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20200: replace polred with polredbest in optimized_representation within number_field.py sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #19194: doctest fix for inconsistencies with dbgprinttree of functions sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #19194: doctest fix for inconsistencies with dbgprinttree of functions sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20035: Enable thickness-option in graph plotting sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20035: Enable thickness-option in graph plotting sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20035: Enable thickness-option in graph plotting sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20035: Enable thickness-option in graph plotting sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20035: Enable thickness-option in graph plotting sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20035: Enable thickness-option in graph plotting sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #17254: Upgrade to Singular-4-0-2 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #17254: Upgrade to Singular-4-0-2 sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #17254: Upgrade to Singular-4-0-2 sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #20513: bug with cyclotomic fields embeddings and coercions sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20513: bug with cyclotomic fields embeddings and coercions sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #20513: bug with cyclotomic fields embeddings and coercions sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15276: Translation problem between Sage and Gap for cyclotomic field sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15114: disallow coercions from RR to RIF sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15249: In lazy power series rings, 0 + a and 0 - a return 0 sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15196: Use mpmath for numerical evaluation of the beta function sage-trac
• Re: [sage-trac] #15188: quo_rem incorret for p-adic polynomials sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15188: quo_rem incorret for p-adic polynomials sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15188: quo_rem incorret for p-adic polynomials sage-trac
  • Re: [sage-trac] #15188: quo_rem incorret for p-adic polynomials sage-trac

• Earlier messages
• Later messages