#4807: bug in exponential integral
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  wdj       |        Owner:  burcin    
     Type:  defect    |       Status:  new       
 Priority:  major     |    Milestone:  sage-3.4.1
Component:  calculus  |   Resolution:            
 Keywords:            |  
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by fredrik.johansson):

 The exponential integral implementation in mpmath was recently improved to
 work for large arguments too:

 {{{
 >>> mp.dps = 50
 >>> ei(mpc(10**30, 10**40))
 
mpc(real='-2.2944454721211223524123643204705731535186663746073664e+4342944819032
 51827651128918876',
 imag='3.310554099386694677220121243704912443715898934912981e
 +434294481903251827651128918876')
 }}}

 However, it is not optimized at all at the moment, and is probably many
 times slower than PARI. ei in mpmath is about 4-8 times slower than the
 cosine integral ci (which is almost the same function as ei, so properly
 optimized they should be about equally fast). [mpmath.ci(x) for x in
 range(10**6)] takes 132 seconds on my laptop.

 If I find the time, I'll try to both optimize and assure accuracy
 everywhere for all the incarnations of exponential, trigonometric and
 hyperbolic integrals in mpmath for the next version.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4807#comment:4>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to