#5345: [with patch, positive review] Optimize transpose, antitranspose for dense
matrices
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  rbeezer         |        Owner:  rbeezer 
     Type:  enhancement     |       Status:  closed  
 Priority:  major           |    Milestone:  sage-3.4
Component:  linear algebra  |   Resolution:  fixed   
 Keywords:  transpose       |  
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

Comment(by mvngu):

 Replying to [comment:6 ylchapuy]:
 > And some statistics:
 > {{{
 > Before:
 >
 > sage: m=identity_matrix(3000)
 > sage: time m2=m.transpose(); m3=m.antitranspose()
 > CPU times: user 14.13 s, sys: 1.11 s, total: 15.44 s
 > Wall time: 15.44 s
 > sage: get_memory_usage()
 > 1254.28125
 >
 > After:
 >
 > sage: m=identity_matrix(3000)
 > sage: time m2=m.transpose(); m3=m.antitranspose()
 > CPU times: user 2.92 s, sys: 0.46 s, total: 3.38 s
 > Wall time: 3.38 s
 > sage: get_memory_usage()
 > 835.6171875
 > }}}
 Is it possible for you to provide some information on the computer/system
 architecture that you used to get the above statistics? The improved
 performance is great news and I'll include this in the release tour at
 [http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.4]
 And it would also be good to have some info about the hardware under which
 you arrived at the above statistics.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5345#comment:11>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to