#13244: make some simplicial complexes faster
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: jhpalmieri
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: algebraic topology | Resolution:
Keywords: sd40 simplicial | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: John Palmieri | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Replying to [comment:2 chapoton]:
> The patch looks good, even if I am not quite convinced by the trading of
time-consumption versus dataspace-usage.
My belief is that this is the better approach since memory/disk space is
cheap, especially compared to CPU cycles since it takes seconds. However I
would argue that each of these should be implemented as (immutable)
singletons unless someone can think of a reason why you would need a true
duplicate.
Also a minor technical thing, from looking at the patch file I believe the
reference in SimplicialComplexExamples() on line 1027 is missing the
linking underscore.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13244#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
