#13244: make some simplicial complexes faster
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: jhpalmieri
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: algebraic topology | Resolution:
Keywords: sd40 simplicial | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: John Palmieri | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
I added the missing underscore; thanks for catching that.
> My belief is that this is the better approach since memory/disk space is
cheap
I certainly agree with this, but I wrote the patch.
> However I would argue that each of these should be implemented as
(immutable) singletons
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean that any two instances of
`simplicial_complexes.K3Surface()` should be identical as far as Python is
concerned? We could try making `SimplicialComplex` inherit from
`UniqueRepresentation`, for example, or maybe we could do this for
`SimplicialComplexExamples`. But I think it could be put off to another
ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13244#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
