#4102: make bessel_J symbolic
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jwmerrill    |         Owner:  burcin  
           Type:  enhancement  |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  major        |     Milestone:  sage-5.4
      Component:  calculus     |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:               |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A          |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:               |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:               |      Stopgaps:          
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 > What is wrong with taking over `bessel_{I,J,K,Y}`? Why do we need
 interim names?
 I concur.
 > >  * `bessel_J_symbolic`
 One could use that as the "symbolic" class one and then do the usual `foo
 = Foo_Class()`?
 > Thanks for looking into this.
 Agreed!

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4102#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to