#4102: make bessel_J symbolic
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: jwmerrill | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Benjamin Jones | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Benjamin Jones', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* cc: dsm (added)
* author: => Benjamin Jones
Comment:
I thought I'd post some work in progress for all the Bessel function fans
in the crowd. There is still work to be done, e.g.
* getting symbolic integration via Maxima to work
* adding maxima, scipy, PARI, etc. to the implemented backend systems
* more documentation and doctests
but at this point the patch applies cleanly to 5.4.1 and all the doctests
in `sage/functions/special.py` pass.
If you are interested, have a look at the doctests included with the
`Bessel` function for examples and let me know if you see any serious
problems (other than the deficits I've listed above).
Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4102#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
