#13295: p_group_cohomology 2.1.3
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
       Reporter:  SimonKing                                     |         
Owner:            
           Type:  defect                                        |        
Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major                                         |     
Milestone:  sage-5.4  
      Component:  optional packages                             |    
Resolution:            
       Keywords:  group cohomology                              |   Work 
issues:  Fix tests 
Report Upstream:  None of the above - read trac for reasoning.  |     
Reviewers:            
        Authors:  Simon King                                    |     Merged 
in:            
   Dependencies:  database_gap-4.4.12.p1, #13123                |      
Stopgaps:            
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Changes (by SimonKing):

  * owner:  tbd =>


Comment:

 Indeed it seems to be some kind of corruption in my home directory. After
 removing `~/.sage/pGroupCohomology` and re-installation of the package,
 I'm left with two copies of a single error:
 {{{
 pGroupCohomology:
 File
 "/Users/SimonKing/.sage/temp/bsd.math.washington.edu/77179/dir_0/file_0.py"
 , line 941:
     sage: (I*I).NF('std(0)').interred()  #long time
 Expected:
     a_4_8*a_6_8*a_1_0^3*a_1_3
 Got:
     a_4_8*a_6_8*a_1_0^3*a_1_3,
     a_4_8*a_6_8*c_8_16*a_1_0^3*a_1_3
 **********************************************************************
 pGroupCohomology.cohomology.COHO.essential_ideal:
 File
 "/Users/SimonKing/.sage/temp/bsd.math.washington.edu/77179/dir_0/file_67.py",
 line 140:
     sage: (I*I).NF('std(0)').interred()  #long time
 Expected:
     a_4_8*a_6_8*a_1_0^3*a_1_3
 Got:
     a_4_8*a_6_8*a_1_0^3*a_1_3,
     a_4_8*a_6_8*c_8_16*a_1_0^3*a_1_3
 }}}

 Isn't that actually a Singular bug? After all, I do interreduction, and
 `a_4_8*a_6_8*c_8_16*a_1_0^3*a_1_3` is clearly reducible by
 `a_4_8*a_6_8*a_1_0^3*a_1_3`.

 Provided that it is an upstream bug, what shall we do? The point of that
 test is that the square of the essential ideal is generated by a single
 non-zero element.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13295#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to