#13295: p_group_cohomology 2.1.3
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Reporter: SimonKing |
Owner:
Type: defect |
Status: needs_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: optional packages |
Resolution:
Keywords: group cohomology | Work
issues: Fix tests
Report Upstream: None of the above - read trac for reasoning. |
Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Merged
in:
Dependencies: database_gap-4.4.12.p1, #13123 |
Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:20 jhpalmieri]:
> Regarding the Singular problems: you could also include the original
doctest, marked as `# known bug in Singular`. "known bug" should tell Sage
to skip the doctest. In any case, you should put in a comment about the
fact that Singular has a bug which requires a workaround.
I have just updated my spkg, temporarily switching `redSB` off. I think
that would be better than skipping the test.
> Should we test this spkg with the new GAP spkg from #13211?
IIRC, I have already tried, and there were various errors (including GAP
crashes, so, it isn't just random noise). I guess this will be version
2.1.4 of the spkg...
I am now testing the updated spkg, but I think it should again be ready
for review...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13295#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.