#13072: Implementation of PartitionTuple + some minor fixes to partition.py
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: andrew.mathas | Owner: Andrew Mathas
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.5
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: tuples of partitions | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Andrew Mathas | Merged in:
Dependencies: #9265, #11446 | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:46 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:45 andrew.mathas]:
> > Jeroen can you please confirm that you are are happy for me to do
this.
> Given the comments of Volker Braun and Simon King, I cannot be happy
with this. No objects should be removed from the pickle jar.
Just my 2 cents: at this point, partition tuples are a rather peripheral
feature. If anyone has saved some pickle containing one, most likely he is
in the Sage-Combinat group. Well most likely it's Andrew actually. So I
vote for not wasting Andrew's time and simply dropping backward
compatibility in that particular situation. I am not taking much risk by
volunteering to help whoever might have trouble with such an old pickle
:-)
Of course, the official procedure would be to run a poll; if you insist,
we can do that on Sage-Combinat devel.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13072#comment:47>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
