#13072: Implementation of PartitionTuple + some minor fixes to partition.py
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: andrew.mathas | Owner: Andrew Mathas
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.5
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: tuples of partitions | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Andrew Mathas | Merged in:
Dependencies: #9265, #11446 | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by andrew.mathas):
Replying to [comment:51 jdemeyer]:
> Removing all whitespace everywhere is a bad idea, don't do it as it will
lead to merge conflicts (unless it was approved by the sage-combinat
group, then I take back my words).
Jeroen, I removed whitespaces added by the patch and then checked that the
sage-combiat queue applied cleanly before pushing the patch both to the
sage-combinat queue and back to trac. I did not remove all white space
from the source files affected by this patch as, I agree, this would
probably cause havoc with the queue. As all of the patches in the sage-
combinat queue still apply cleanly I am putting this back to a positive
review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13072#comment:52>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
