#13665: New implementation of the blocks_and_cut_vertices method
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  dcoudert       |         Owner:  jason, ncohen, rlm
           Type:  enhancement    |        Status:  needs_review      
       Priority:  major          |     Milestone:  sage-5.5          
      Component:  graph theory   |    Resolution:                    
       Keywords:                 |   Work issues:                    
Report Upstream:  N/A            |     Reviewers:                    
        Authors:  David Coudert  |     Merged in:                    
   Dependencies:                 |      Stopgaps:                    
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Changes (by dcoudert):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 > Here is a patch that contains documentation only (if you like it), and
 three comments :
 I like the doc
 > * What about replacing top by -1 everywhere ? This is Python code, not C
 arrays ! :-P
 done
 > * Instead of ``if stack`` and indenting maaaaaaaaany lines in the code,
 what about writing instead ``if not stack: return whatever`` (and remove
 the terminal 'return' line) or ``if not stack: break`` and leave the code
 at its natural level ?
 done
 > * ``w = stack.pop()`` at this line w is equal to v, isn't it ? ``O_o``
 as it appears often afterwards I would sleep easier (unless I make a
 mistake) if it were replaced by ``w = v`` to make it explicit. With a
 ``stack.pop()`` just near, or course.

 I disagree. If we put {{{w = v}}}, then we still have to pop the top of
 the stack. It is more compact to write {{{w = stack.pop()}}}. Furthermore
 I don't think it could be faster to have 2 operations instead of 1.

 > Thaaaaaaaanks for that patch ! I'll go enjoy some sun while it stays
 `:-)`
 Lucky you are. Here it's cold, raining, no light... welcome to the french
 riviera ;-)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13665#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to