#8327: Implement the universal cyclotomic field, using Zumbroich basis
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery                            |         Owner:           
   
           Type:  enhancement                        |        Status:  
needs_review
       Priority:  major                              |     Milestone:  sage-5.6 
   
      Component:  number fields                      |    Resolution:           
   
       Keywords:  Cyclotomic field, Zumbroich basis  |   Work issues:           
   
Report Upstream:  N/A                                |     Reviewers:           
   
        Authors:  Christian Stump, Simon King        |     Merged in:           
   
   Dependencies:  #13727, #13728                     |      Stopgaps:           
   
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------

Comment (by stumpc5):

 Replying to [comment:117 chapoton]:

 > I do not understand : if one look at Ticket #13728, the method is_unit
 does check that an element is not zero !

 That's right, but even though UCF knows that it is a field, its elements
 do not know that they are field elements. Do you happen to know how to
 solve that?

 > Well, I do not know. The point is that we can currently use QQbar(z) for
 z in UCF. I wonder wether one could do AA(z) for z in UCF and real,
 because AA is just the set of real elements of QQbar. But maybe I do not
 understand something..

 (I thought you meant the other way round...) It was easy to implement the
 conversion to QQ and ZZ, and to set the coercion to QQbar. But I don't
 quite know how to do conversion to AA.
 {{{
 sage: AA(QQbar(x))
 0.618033988749895?
 }}}
 works, but one currently has to pass through QQbar.

 > Yes, But I rather meant the mathematical point : the field is defined as
 an embedded field, not as an abstract field..

 Okay, I will add a sentence in the beginning.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8327#comment:118>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to