#13672: resultant over GF(q)[t][x] is plain wrong!!!
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
       Reporter:  zimmerma             |         Owner:  malb    
           Type:  defect               |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  critical             |     Milestone:  sage-5.6
      Component:  commutative algebra  |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:                       |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A                  |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:                       |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:                       |      Stopgaps:          
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):

  * priority:  blocker => critical
  * milestone:  sage-5.5 => sage-5.6


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:6 zimmerma]:
 > Martin, it would be better to understand why {{{x}}} is special first.
 I'll add the authors of
 > {{{polynomial_element.pyx}}} in cc.
 `x` is special because PARI has a concept of "variable" priority, where
 `x` has highest priority.

 But it seems that PARI/GP can compute resultants w.r.t. a different
 variable:
 {{{
 gp> ?polresultant
 polresultant(x,y,{v},{flag=0}): resultant of the polynomials x and y, with
 respect to the main variables of x and y if v is omitted, with
 respect to the variable v otherwise. flag is optional, and can be 0:
 default, uses either the subresultant algorithm, a modular algorithm
 or Sylvester's matrix, depending on the inputs; 1 uses Sylvester's matrix
 (should always be slower than the default).
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13672#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to