#12415: Update doctesting framework
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: robertwb
|
Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement
|
Status: needs_work
Priority: major
|
Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: doctest
|
Resolution:
Keywords:
|
Work issues: interrupt.pyx failure
Report Upstream: N/A
|
Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: David Roe, Robert Bradshaw
|
Merged in:
Dependencies: #13147,#13146, #13145, #12723, #12392, #12393, #12395,
#12396, #12397, #12381, #12382, #12383, #12384, #11871, #13195, #13121,#13748
| Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by roed):
Replying to [comment:131 jhpalmieri]:
> If the issue isn't related to the new doctesting framework, but is a
pre-existing condition revealed by it, then it shouldn't be a dependency,
but a separate issue. If that was the only issue with this ticket, then
this ticket could be merged, right?
I have no problem with that interpretation. But in some sense it is
related to the new doctesting framework since we weren't using Python's
multiprocessing module before.
So, does anyone want to give this ticket a positive review?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12415#comment:132>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
