#5146: [with patch; needs review] implement MPolynomial_ideal.variety() for
GF(p)
with p > than what Singular supports
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner: malb
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.4.2
Component: commutative algebra | Keywords:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by john_perry):
I made the changes Martin recommended: namely, de-nesting the nested
functions and adding doctests.
One reason the functions were nested is that I was using certain
assumptions. I thought that made life easier but in retrospect it doesn't.
This allowed me to simplify the functions.
In addition the documentation follows the format Martin was using (ReST?).
I'm still using my own coefficient_matrix() but I reckon that can be
adjusted if desired.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5146#comment:8>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
