#5537: [with patch, mostly positive review] bug in __cmp__ in
permgroup_element.pyx
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: robertwb
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.4.2
Component: group_theory | Keywords:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by rbeezer):
Replying to [comment:6 jhpalmieri]:
John,
I like the clear explanation of the ordering on permutations.
Do the examples with < and > (or != and == in the referee patch) really
need to come from the generators of some group? This just seems to make
it harder for someone to decipher. Would it be clearer to just make two
or three elements using {{{PermutationGroupElement()}}}, possibly with
different "sizes", and then put them through some of the possible
comparisons to exercise as much of the new code as possible?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5537#comment:8>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
