#12508: Optimize zero test in dict_addition.pyx
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: hivert | Owner: hivert
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: #12510 | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by stumpc5):
Replying to [comment:7 stumpc5]:
> Replying to [comment:6 hivert]:
> > Replying to [comment:5 stumpc5]:
> > It's Python's specification, so it definitely should return what we
want. Now the best way to be sure that it does is to add it in the generic
tests for object in the category {{{FreeModules()}}}. Since now, thanks to
Simon all rings conform with categories, adding a test here should catch
all problems.
>
> Things are getting forward, that's great to hear!
I just saw this patch in my list, so I give it a ping to see if this was
solved somewhere else, or if it is still to be done (most likely by you,
Florent ?)...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12508#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
